User talk:RobbieFal

Hello RobbieFal and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

thanks/jim jeffords

I was slowly plodding through completing entries for all of Texas' congressmen, but you saved me the trouble, thank you. Also I noticed that Jim Jeffords, the gentleman from Vermont, is missing from your list of party switchers. Thanks again. Thepedestrian 05:03, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Linda Smith

The Linda Smith page that your user page links to is now a disambiguation page. I think that Linda Smith (politician) is the name of the article about the person mentioned in your table. Tim Ivorson 15:13, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

156.63.253.3

You may complain on WP:VIP (an hope someone will notice) or directory to some Admin. This is case for block, IMHO. Pavel Vozenilek 05:23, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Tom Metzger

A tag has been placed on Tom Metzger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Tom Metzger is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Tom Metzger. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable.Tom 15:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I immediately recognized this name but cannot think of the details. I think he has something to do with the "Radical Right" in CA. User:Billy Hathorn

Christian Nationalist Crusade

As a writer, back in 2004 on Gerlad (not O. K.) Smith, I though I might invite to to visit the site above for which I've just written a stub. Also, I would like to see a separate article on the Christian Nationalist Party, and I cannot think of anyone better to write it than you.

My interest in Smith is related to his distribution of G. F. Green's, British, abridged edition of The International Jew.

Yours truly, --Ludvikus 02:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Akin

Thanks for adding Akin's quote about Davy Crockett and his Blackberry to Akin's page. It's ridiculous. =D 152.23.196.162 08:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore G. Bilbo

I was just working on Theodore G. Bilbo and noticing what a nicely written and well balanced articlce it is. Checking the history I see you wrote the initial draft.[1] Though it has expanded and changed since then it's recognizably the same article. It's easy to think of Wikipedia as a 'sand castle' always in danger of collapsing, but articles like that show the project can elicit and maintain useful material. Thanks for being a part of that. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 11:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for those compliaments. --RobbieFal 16:29, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review of Ralph Flanders Invitation

In the past, you have shown an interest in the article on Ralph Flanders (by initiating the page). It has recently been substantially updated. You are invited to leave your peer review at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/Ralph Flanders.—HopsonRoad 12:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

United States House of Representatives elections in South Carolina, 1938

You are right about the primary figures for the 3rd Cong. Dist. in the 1938 SC US House elections. I acquired the figures from the book The Primary State: A History of the Democratic Party in South Carolina, 1876-1962, but I might have wrote it down wrong. If I wrote it down correctly, then I'll try to look up the results in a 1938 newspaper. And my local newspaper probably won't have those results so I would need access to the SC Dem papers at USC or if someone in Anderson would look up the results in a 1938 newspaper. Gamecock (talk) 00:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello RobbieFal! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 142 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Susan Molinari - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tommy F. Robinson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Paul E. Kanjorski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John Paul Hammerschmidt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kaneaster Hodges, Jr. - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy

Attacks in the article William E. Riker

Warning

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at William E. Riker. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Weaponbb7 (talk) 17:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congressional terms in 19th century

Thank you for your comments. I know that there was some time ago a discussion about when the tenure of congressmen began. I do not want to waste time to read all that stuff, but I will give you the general rule which, in my opinion, complies with common sense: Congressmen elected before the term began hold office for the legal term (i.e. March 4, XXXX, to March 3, XXXX+2); congressmen elected after the term began, hold office from the day they take the seat. Option one covers almost all regularly elected congressmen from New York since they held election in even-numbered years, long before the term began. There were only two exceptions 1793 and 1821. 1793 the elections were held in January, so there is no problem. In 1821, the elections were held in late April, the results published in late June, well into the term, although Congress had not met yet. I strongly oppose a "retroactive" tenure in this case (and all similar ones). Think about it, people holding office before they are elected, in my opinion that is utterly absurd. I do make an exception for the congressmen who were re-elected, not interrupting their tenure, because they stayed in office one way or another, not missing any sessions. Kraxler (talk) 14:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answering your last message, I have to disagree in a way. The seats are vacant, there can be no doubt, "unfilled" is just another word (implying an imminent filling though), but in Legalese they use always the word vacant, both for temporary (like when a Governor is out of the State) and definite vacancies (like after a resignation or death). If nobody is elected to succeed, the seat becomes vacant. That Congress was not actually in session complicates the thing very much, no doubt. It led also to that unsettled controversy about the begin of tenure, except for the First Congress, none actually convened on March 4. That should be common knowledge but, since Congress is sitting now all year round, I suspect that most people don't know. (A similar problem arises with federal appointive offices when it comes to 19th century "recess appointments" and 20th century "acting" or "interim" office-holders.) As I said, I think that the abovementioned general rule stands to reason, since in case of a late election, the only unquestionable date is when the man took his seat, it's recorded in the journal of the House. Some people never took their seats, like Selah Tuthill, he was never in Washington, D.C., elected late, and died before Congress met... Kraxler (talk) 17:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phantom ballplayer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Texas Rangers and Luke Jackson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blackburn/McCafferty Trophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Wright. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RobbieFal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RobbieFal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RobbieFal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RobbieFal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Media in Kansas City, Missouri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KCSP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:51, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve KRLI

Hello, RobbieFal,

Thanks for creating KRLI! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add references and why this is notable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Amo Houghton

On 8 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Amo Houghton, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:52, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Tom Coburn

On 30 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tom Coburn, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 18:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Carrie Meek

On 2 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Carrie Meek, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 06:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for John R. Brinkley

John R. Brinkley has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Kimikel (talk) 00:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]